Categories: LegalUS

Supreme Court justice worries Constitution may restrain government

US Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Monday expressed concern that the US Constitution is restraining the federal government, appearing particularly troubled by the First Amendment.

Jackson made the remarks during oral arguments in Murthy vs. Missouri, where the Biden administration is arguing for the right to pressure social media companies into censoring American taxpayers. The government hopes to overturn a ruling last year from US District Judge Terry Doughty which banned the practice. 

After hearing about the federal government’s efforts to censor Americans on COVID-19 and the 2020 election, Doughty determined on July 4th that “the United States Government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth’” and may be responsible for “the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history.”

But Biden appointee Ketanji Brown Jackson appears poised to vote against Doughty’s ruling, saying she is worried the First Amendment may rein in the federal government from censoring taxpayers.

“My biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important time periods,” Jackson told Louisiana Solicitor General Benjamin Aguiñaga.

“You seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information. So, can you help me?” the Supreme Court justice continued. “Because I’m really worried about that because you’ve got the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening circumstances, from the government’s perspective, and you’re saying that the government can’t interact with the source of those problems.”

Jackson mentioned COVID-19 as an example of a “threatening circumstance” that requires the government to step in and curb free speech, as it did.

In an interview Monday, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) commented on Jackson’s remarks and said restraining the federal government is the very purpose of the US Constitution.

“She said you’ve got the First Amendment ‘hamstringing the government.’ Well, that’s what it’s supposed to do, for goodness sake,” Jordan said. “It was literally one of the craziest things I’ve ever seen, that you could have a Supreme Court Justice say that in the oral argument made no sense to me.

“That is frightening because if she really believes that, that is scary where we are heading. Understand what took place here. This was censorship by surrogate. This was big government telling Big Tech to take down speech that they disagreed with, and it was the most fundamental kind of speech. It was political speech.”

Yudi Sherman

Recent Posts

Israelis initiate movement promoting Jewish settlement in southern Lebanon

As Israel's north absorbs fatal rocket attacks by the Hezbollah Islamic organization, a movement of…

6 months ago

Bridges, airplanes, and diversity exterminating competence: Analysis

The ship that collided this week with Baltimore's Key Bridge, the MV Dali container vessel,…

6 months ago

Irish hate legislation fails after intense popular backlash

In a dramatic turn of events, Sinn Féin announced Monday its opposition to the Irish…

6 months ago

Pressure mounts on British health secretary to come clean on vaccine fallout

A bipartisan group of British lawmakers is pressuring Health Secretary Victoria Atkins to prove government…

6 months ago

Comedian slams woke assault on comedy

TV host and comedian Howie Mandel last week joined a chorus of other comedy artists…

6 months ago

TikTok censors anti-birth control content at media’s request

TikTok is removing videos that criticize hormonal birth control for being “misinformation” at the request…

6 months ago