A prototype for blocking out the sun “to reduce global warming” could be ready in just three years.
Governments such as the US and European Union, along with globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), have been researching ways to modify the weather to “fight climate change.” One of these methods is solar geoengineering, which involves reducing the sun’s reach to Earth. For example, planes could emit certain aerosols into the atmosphere using a process known as solar radiation modification (SRM), which would divert the sun’s rays away from Earth. Other proposed techniques involve launching sizable balloons or umbrellas into the stratosphere to obstruct sunlight.
This last method has so far proved too scientifically complex to implement. A solar shield large enough to blot out the recommended amount of sun — which scientists say should be about 2% of its rays — would need to be around 100 million square miles, or around the size of Argentina. It would also weigh about 2.5 million tons, making it too heavy to launch into space.
But a team of researchers at the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology believes they have found the solution.
Dr. Yoram Rozen, who heads the university’s Asher Space Research Institute, told the New York Times this month that the sun could be blocked using a series of smaller solar shields which would diffuse sunlight and “shade” the Earth.
“We can show the world, look, there is a working solution, take it, increase it to the necessary size,” Rozen told the Times.
Rozen and his team are designing a 100-foot prototype as a proof of concept but need $10 million–$20 million to build it. They can have one built within three years of receiving the necessary funding. To build the required number of shades would cost trillions of dollars, which Rozen hopes will be footed by several countries.
“We at the Technion are not going to save the planet,” Rozen said. “But we’re going to show that it can be done.”
However, even if Rozen’s idea is implemented and the sun is blocked, this would not absolve humanity from making major sacrifices for “climate change,” the Times notes. Humans would still be required to lay off all fossil fuels, including the burning of coal, gas, and oil. In fact, even if “climate change” were solved and global warming was stopped in its tracks, humans would still need to sacrifice their lifestyles because of “excessive heat-trapping carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.”
In a 44-page report last year, the White House acknowledged the risks associated with reducing the sun’s rays, such as disruptions to food supplies and health risks. But the government concluded that these dangers must be weighed against the dangers posed by the weather.
