New achievements indicate that a decades-old strategy to slow down population growth in the US is a huge success.
A recent Statista article states that 25% of US adults aged 40 have never been married, which is a record high since data began to be released in 1990. Just 22% of these adults claim to live with a spouse, while the majority live alone. Following Black Americans, who make up nearly half (46%) of all Americans, Hispanics (27%) and Asian Americans (17%) are the next most likely to still be unmarried at age 40.
Avoiding marriage is a component of the Jaffe Memo’s depopulation strategy, which was created more than 50 years ago.
A group of recommendations to slow down US population growth were developed in 1969 by an economist by the name of Frederick Jaffe, and they are still implemented today. Bernard Berelson had asked Jaffe, who was vice president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America at the time, to develop the scheme.
In order to reduce the number of births in the country, John D. Rockefeller III established the Population Council, which was led by Berelson. The Population Council continues to focus on the development of contraception and other methods of birth control, like the intrauterine Copper T device. Since then, more than 70 countries have received an estimated 50 million Copper Ts.
In 1969, Berelson was searching for inspiration.
Rising to the challenge, Jaffe wrote what would come to be known as the Jaffe Memo in response. In it, Jaffe put up a series of measures that, in his opinion, could lower the US birth rate. He compiled these into a table which he titled “Proposed measures to reduce fertility by universality or selectivity of impact in the US.”
Providing “abortion and sterilization on demand,” “making contraception truly available and accessible,” “allowing harmless contraceptives to be distributed nonmedically,” and “encouraging increased homosexuality” were a few of the suggested policies.
“Restructure family” was the title of another measure, which was divided into two sections: “(a) Postpone or avoid marriage” and “(b) Alter image of ideal family size.”
These were presented with two additional proposals made by Jaffe: encouraging women to pursue higher education and persuading more of them to enter the workforce.
According to Jaffe, “[T]he relationship between women’s employment and lower fertility seems well established.” He claimed that greater inflation comes with full employment, suggesting that the US may have to accept this trade-off in order to depopulate. He posed the question, “How much inflation could or should we risk to achieve lower fertility?”
Globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the United Nations have made increasing the number of women in the workforce a top priority. It is well known that the UN actively promotes women’s employment at almost every chance, even elevating it to the status of a public health concern.
This has also turned into a resounding success. Pew Research data indicates that Millennial women possess a bachelor’s degree at a rate four times higher than that of Silent Generation women. Furthermore, women who have higher levels of education are more likely to either delay or forego having children.
Moreover, only approximately 40% of women had jobs at the time of the Jaffe Memo. It is currently 72% among Millennial women.
According to Business Insider, women who prioritize their professions over having children are the main cause of the dropping birth and marriage rates. This is “a sign of economic progress, signaling a rise in individualism and women’s autonomy.”
“It’s impossible for me to balance employment and kids. According to Jennifer Mathieu, a 40-year-old working woman, “I have zero regrets, love my life, and think at least three to four times a week about how thankful I am that I do not have children.” She also stated, “I wouldn’t be able to care for my two dogs without my husband.”
Another female worker, Heather Watson, stated, “We both work hard at our careers and honestly didn’t feel like children fit into the life and goals we wanted. It always felt like it would be unfair to kids to try to fit them into our lives.”
“Kids are expensive and sticky,” said another.
According to Statista, women now believe they have “gained economic power” and therefore no longer see marriage as crucial:
The general increase of people who are still single by 40 suggests that there has been a shift in sentiments on the importance of marriage. The trend is likely due to a wide variety and combination of factors, whether that’s a loosening of stigma around being single, or as Belinda Luscombe of Time Magazine explains, due to economic reasons, such as the fact that since women have “gained economic power, they needed to rely less on men to provide”, or conversely, because many men say they feel they need a level of financial stability to be ready for marriage.
Jaffe suggested adding “fertility control agents in the water supply” as one of his other suggested courses of action.
Common pesticides have been shown to feminize males in addition to having a significant negative impact on fertility. Most male frogs exposed to the pesticide atrazine developed an attraction to other guys, including some that started acting like females and laid eggs, according to a study on the toxin. Syngenta, a business owned by the Chinese Communist Party, produces the majority of the atrazine used in American agriculture.
It has recently been reported that these pesticides, which have been found in US water supplies, have caused a 50% decrease in men’s sperm counts in the past 50 years.
Jaffe has suggested government incentives for reduced birth rates and mandatory schooling for children as potential effective depopulation strategies. One of the suggested metrics is titled “chronic depression” and does not provide any additional context.
One of the recommendations, and a main tenet of the WEF’s Agenda 2030, is discouraging private property ownership, promising taxpayers that they will “own nothing and you’ll be happy.”
The premise of these ideas, according to Jaffe, is that, given current voluntary norms, “a society where effective contraception is efficiently distributed to all would either result in a tolerable rate of growth, or go very far toward achieving it. If this theory is essentially correct, it would eliminate the requirement for a clear U.S. population policy which goes beyond voluntary norms.”
Then-President Richard Nixon suggested the establishment of a presidential advisory panel in the year the Jaffe Memo was written, with the goal of devising a strategy to address the “population problem.” Nixon appointed Jaffe and Berelson to the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future the following year.
All significant globalist groups have wholeheartedly embraced the steps that Jaffe suggested and put into effect, encouraging women in the workforce, birth control, abortion, and homosexuality under the guise of “gender equality.”
These days, gender equality, abortion on demand, and even “climate change” are highlighted on the Population Council’s website as factors that affect “reproductive health and fertility.”
Several globalist organizations, especially FP2030, have been making significant investments to realize the Jaffe Memo.
In July 2012 the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the US Agency for International Development (USAID), the UK Department for International Development (DFID), and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) gathered in London. The stated purpose of the summit was “to empower the voluntary use of modern contraception by 120 million additional women and girls in the world’s lowest-income countries by 2020.” Family Planning 2020 was formed.
Almost 130 nations, organizations, and businesses quickly joined FP2020 in supporting the cause. Pharmaceutical corporations such as Bayer and Pfizer promised to supply birth control drugs globally.
The founders of FP2020 must have thought it was so successful when 2020 drew near that they decided to extend it for ten more years and changed the organization’s name to FP2030. Managing Director for North America and Europe Monica Kerrigan, MPH, a former employee of Planned Parenthood, the Gates Foundation, and USAID, is one of its globalist supervisors.
FP2030 was awarded $1.4 billion in government funding in 2021; USAID provided more than $500 million of this total annually.
The founding organizations of FP2030 first make contact with a representative of the nation’s Health Ministry before launching a birth prevention campaign in that nation. They give the official a plan that includes high-impact practices (HIPs) for mass birth prevention and the funding necessary to implement it.
FP2030 aims to persuade women to use birth prevention devices rather than just providing them. Any method aimed at preventing mass births must therefore “improve attitudes.”
Mass media is one of the primary tools used to influence public opinion and attitudes around birth prevention. Organizations were urged to “[u]se one or more mass media channels (radio, TV, print) to increase knowledge, improve attitudes and self-efficacy, and encourage social change to effect family planning” during a 2016 High Impact Practices Partners meeting that FP2030 operators attended.
Using gender confusion ideology as a means of preventing mass births is another aspect of the plan. Men and women naturally procreate, but defying “gender norms” by masculinizing women and effeminizing men can effectively stop the population from growing.
According to an FP2030 presentation titled “FP2030 Gender Strategy,” “For FP2030, an intentional approach to gender equality makes our work more effective in advancing both family planning and gender equality.”
Gender-transformative initiatives will expedite progress on contraceptive access and usage and advance gender equality with greater money and scale, according to the organization, which also notes clearly that “[g]ender norms… create barriers to FP access.”
According to FP2030, gender ideology, or “positive gender norms,” can be “more effective” in nations where birth prevention rates are stagnating. Demand-side interventions that promote positive gender norms have the potential to be more effective than supply-side methods in countries where the prevalence of contraceptives has plateaued.
Feminist activists are also very useful in promoting birth avoidance, according to Gender Strategy.
This could also explain why “Pride” organizations and events are being heavily funded by US spy services to promote gender confusion throughout the world.
Birth control pills themselves also contribute to this gender confusion. Scientific evidence suggests that women who take birth control tablets are prone to think less appealing of themselves and more attractive in effeminate men. Additionally, they are more inclined to cheat on their partners and experience sexual dissatisfaction. The woman can stop taking the pill if she wants to get pregnant, but doing so might make her lose interest in her partner and possibly cause the family to fall apart if a kid is born.
A strong desire exists among globalists to stem birth rates. The World Health Organization (WHO) advises women to receive birth preventative injections even if some of them may raise their risk of HIV.
“WHO advises that women should not be denied the use of progestogen-only injectables because of concerns about the possible increased [HIV] risk,” reads an FP2020 report. Women should be made aware of the increased risk of HIV, it continues, but they should also be told there is “uncertainty over a causal relationship.”
A component of FP2030’s mass birth prevention approach is vaccination.
For example, the government of Nepal “is developing an integrated care strategy that includes immunization and family planning.” Making sure that post-abortion family planning is consistently available is progressing. “Using mass media to reach youth, ethnic minorities, and marginalized and disadvantaged groups with family planning information” is another use of FP2030 money for Nepal.
In the end, FP2030 has shown to be effective. According to the organization, one in three women who are of reproductive age are currently utilizing birth control products, with Sub-Saharan Africa seeing the largest increase in this rate. An estimated 371 million women and girls worldwide were using birth control as of July 2022.
Remarkably, men also utilize birth control products in addition to this.
