CDC redacts every word of 148-page COVID vaccine myocarditis study

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in March redacted every word of a 148-page study about myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. The study had been requested by the Epoch Times in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

The FOIA request asked for information about the CDC’s MOVING project, or “CDC Moving Forward”, which, according to the CDC, “was launched in response to the operational challenges faced by the CDC” during the COVID-19 rollout. Its goals include “developing a diverse workforce prepared for future emergencies, enhancing laboratory science and quality, promoting results-based partnerships, and integrating health equity.”

Dr. Peter McCollough called the redaction: “One more example of all trust lost with the CDC. Agency releases vaccine myocarditis manuscript with all pages redacted so patient and scientific community is blocked from learning more about this deadly COVID-19 vaccine side effect.”

In a hearing last week by the Novel Coronavirus Southwestern Intergovernmental Committee held in Phoenix, Arizona State Senator Janae Shamp RN questioned Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Robert Apter, and Dr. Stephen Hale about various public health issues, including Vitamin D’s role in preventing COVID-19.

Shamp displayed the 148 blank pages of the CDC’s myocarditis report, asking: “What good does a study do, if there’s nothing there? What might have been there that they needed to redact it? That’s even scarier.”

Dr. Peter McCullough answered Shamp, saying: “We’re witnessing an active coverup of a colossal consumer product safety debacle that has basically affected the entire world.”

McCullough continued: “So in the United States, our CDC, National Institutes of Health, and the FDA are actively involved in a coverup. And the same is occurring in the UK with the MHRA, Europe with the European Medicine Agency, and Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration.

“Something is going on that’s very big. Each one of these companies that puts out a product has an obligation to produce 90 days of safety monitoring after their product comes out. It’s a regulatory dossier; if somebody has a problem with the new product, and they call the company, like Pfizer; Pfizer has to report what happened, and they have to collate that in a report, they have to produce it and make it publicly available.

“When it came to 90 days with Pfizer, the first vaccine that came out – remember Pfizer was approved December 10th, 2020 – Pfizer didn’t produce a report. And people started asking, ‘Well, what’s happening with your vaccine?’ And Pfizer would not disclose what happened, and then it went to court. And the lawyer for the FDA stepped in and said that they don’t want to release Pfizer’s dossier for 55 years. 55 years. And the plaintiff pushed, and finally, slowly, the Pfizer dossier came out.

“Pfizer recorded 1,223 deaths with their product within 90 days of release. People were calling Pfizer in desperation, watching their family members die after taking the vaccine.

“Pfizer recorded over 1,200 new adverse events, new problems that Dr. Boden has talked to you about, that we are grappling with the entire time. But the point is our FDA worked to cover this up. The FDA should be regulating this company; the FDA should have been having at least monthly meetings and fully disclosing what was going on with these novel vaccines, which are a genetic transfer technology platform. It’s the first time human beings have ever been injected with foreign genetic material in world history. Now, they were getting it full-on: 2/3 of the world’s population took these…”